![]() It sounds great to have such an cc-offtank, lets say multiclassed with trickster or wizard/bloodmage. The bad thing is that majority of fights aren't long, and you would do better from damage-dealing perspective by multiclassing vancian/vancian or even straight single-classing an evoker, bloodmage or priest.Īlso, since your focus generation is now decoupled from phys damage output, you can dump your Might, grab a shield, or wield heavier armor without repercussions. You toss some vancian spells, in meantime get focus, use it, and switch back to vancian spells. The best way to capitalize on this is: multi-class with someone who doesn't deal weapon damage. ![]() Cipher: the sweet thing about cipher is that once you figure out how to achieve high focus generation you can get ahead of the curve. then it's a different story, since a troubadour will outdamage him. if the bonus PL only applies to chants and invocations. Since it was increased to +1 bonus PL it is now an interesting option for a belower/evoker - who can cast an invocation, and basically follow up with empowered evocation stuff. Chanter: at +0.5 bonus PL per phrase consumed, it was pretty meh. It doesn't look as powerful as tactician/trickster or skald/trickster, but it's ok. But it opens the possibility to crease a multi-classed barb based on debuffing - the one who is focused on wards, shouts and jumps. So I won't be building this subclass as damage-dealer ever. Furyshaper: the wards have 3s/4s cast/recovery time which is quite long in my book. Ranger - Arcane Archer (early-game): 4/10 Monk - Forbidden Fist (with shenanigans): 5/10 So:īarbarian - Furyshaper: 4.5/10 or 5.5 (is fear ward is pulsing every 3s, and not tunnel-vision by enemies)Ĭhanter - Belower (if PL bonus is universal): 7/10Ĭhanter - Belower (if PL bonus is chanter only): 4/10įighter - Tactician (if penalty is changed from -1PEN, -5ACC, to lets say -2PEN): 9/10 Also my views might shift as I play more with them. ![]() But let it be overall impact that I would expect them to bring to my possible parties.Īnd just a reminder: this is very subjective, and as Frak mentioned above related to personal playstyle. Uhh, dunno what metric exactly to use for rating.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |